Review of the incident

On June 24, in a community in Foshan City, Guangdong, two elderly people were taking their golden retriever for a walk with a leash on it. Suddenly, a puppy without a leash rushed over quickly. , flew towards the golden retriever. The golden retriever judged that it was in danger. For the purpose of protecting its owner, it instinctively protected itself and bit the puppy, accidentally killing the puppy.
The golden retriever Jiangui has been trained by a professional organization in Beijing, has a certificate, all the documents, and is on a leash. However, the puppy came menacingly and jumped on the golden retriever. As a result, due to the disparity in size and strength, the old man did not... I want to leave and want to negotiate.

The strong man beat the golden retriever to death crazily and sent the old man to the hospital.

Both two elderly people were pushed and beaten. After their injuries, their condition was not optimistic and they were transferred to Foshan No. 1 Hospital.
The old man suffered from stress-induced cerebral infarction and stress-induced increase in blood pressure.
The old woman currently has two broken vertebrae, her lower limbs are weak, and she can no longer stand up.

During the man's murder, the old man untied the traction force, hoping that Jianjian could escape. However, Jianjian sincerely saw the man's unrelenting desire to hurt his master and returned to the scene of the crime. As a result, Jianjian He was brutally beaten to death with sticks.

Police information report of deviation

Many public accounts and media are reporting on this matter, but I am not.
The purpose of the report is to inform the world. Now that everyone knows it, I thought there was no need for me to do more.
But in this article after article, what I see is the "Xingju" that is taken astray and the slightly rhythmic copywriting ideas, each of which is "very satisfying"...
< h2>Shunde police reported the results of the case
The content emphasized the antecedents of the golden retriever being killed with a stick, so he was detained.
At first glance, there is nothing wrong with it. Please read it a few times and combine it with the video. Do you find any problems?
The 70-year-old man was threatened and injured by the man and was hospitalized. The dog was not on leash and the Shunde police did not mention anything.
Then I would like to ask why the man was rejected? Because of killing a dog? Under which law?
Please tell me if you can, so that future pet friends in Shunde will know how to protect their dogs’ rights.

In fact, everyone knows very well that criminal detention is for hurting people. If it is for hurting people, then according to our country's criminal law, it seems that this case should not be as simple as "criminal detention". What will be the follow-up?
It has been nearly a week since the incident occurred. According to the analysis of netizens, if the celebrity had not spoken out, this incident would probably have gone to waste.

Why did the focus turn to golden retrievers killing puppies? Is it because of the large dogs? Can’t you summarize the key points and central ideas of the case?

The old man is not out of danger, but the official avoids itTake it easy

I believe most people are dissatisfied with the results of the treatment. There are three reasons:
1. The man was uncivilized in raising dogs. He made the mistake first. He beat the golden retriever to death, intentionally injured others, and violated the criminal law. It seems that Not punished accordingly.

2. The police avoided the important matter and did not mention the lack of traction or the wounding of people. They focused entirely on the golden retriever that killed the dog before it was beaten to death by the assailant. Is this the only part of the man’s guilt?

3. The owner of the puppy is so evil that he can summon four or five men with sticks with just one phone call to commit murder and hurt people for her in broad daylight. His power seems immeasurable.
The official report only mentioned that the main criminal was detained, but did not mention how to deal with the co-perpetrators and the woman who instigated, provoked and caused trouble.

Nowadays, the whole country is cracking down on organized crime. Who gave us the courage to act so lawlessly, ignore laws and regulations, and gangs hurt people?
They were summoned with just one phone call, besieged the old man and the dog, and carried iron objects to carry out the murder. Couldn’t this be considered an evil force?
They are simply ruffians who dominate the area.
If the police don’t deal with the evil gangs that come to your doorstep, will they keep them for the New Year?

If this case can only be regarded as a civil dispute and someone is injured but the case cannot be filed and the people involved cannot be brought to justice, it will be a tragedy for our entire nation. Isn’t it illegal and criminal to destroy public and private property?

In another scenario, if one day the dog is hit and killed by a car because the dog is not leashed, will the hostess call four or five strong men to kill the car owner? Beaten to death? Do we have to wait until such a tragedy occurs before we can file a case?

Already suspected of illegal crimes

According to the "Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China"
Article 292: Gathering a crowd to fight
Gathering a crowd to fight, The ringleaders and other active participants shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or surveillance; under any of the following circumstances, the ringleaders and other active participants shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years:
(3) Gathering to fight in public places or traffic arteries, causing serious disorder in social order; (4) Gathering to fight with weapons. Anyone who gathers a crowd to fight and causes serious injury or death shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of Articles 234 and 232 of this Law.

If you want to say that it is not a gathering of people and does not count as a gang of evil forces, then it is fine, then:
"Criminal Law"
234 Article 10 Crime of Intentional Injury
Whoever intentionally injures another person's body shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance. Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph and causes serious injury shall be sentenced to threeA person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years and not more than 10 years; whoever causes death or serious injury and severe disability by particularly cruel means shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years but not more than 10 years, or life imprisonment or death. If this law provides otherwise, the provisions shall prevail.

Article 275: Crime of intentional destruction of property
Whoever intentionally damages public or private property and the amount is relatively large or there are other serious circumstances shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention, or a fine; If the crime is huge or there are other particularly serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years.

Article 289: Crime of Intentional Injury
Whoever gathers a crowd to "beat, smash, and rob", causing injury, disability, or death, shall be punished in accordance with Article 234 and 2 of this Law. Article 132 provides for conviction and punishment.
Whoever destroys or robs public or private property shall, in addition to being ordered to refund compensation, and the ringleaders shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of Article 263 of this Law.

According to the "Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China"
Article 84 Code of Conduct for Animal Breeders
Raising animals must abide by the law, respect social ethics, and must not interfere with the lives of others .

If the puppy is bitten to death, shouldn’t the owner of the golden retriever be held responsible?

Although the puppy is not on a leash, I think partial compensation still needs to be made in accordance with the Property Law of the People's Republic of China. In addition, the Golden Retriever family has not violated any other laws.

The act of beating a golden retriever to death and intentionally injuring others not only violates the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China and the Property Law of the People's Republic of China, but also the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. It is by no means a mere criminal detention.

Walking your dog without a leash is the same as walking your dog. Then blame others for hurting your dog afterwards. Isn’t this self-defeating?

And I believe that our country’s laws will never tolerate any bad person and will punish them severely.